↓ Skip to main content

GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN THE SONG OF WILLOW FLYCATCHERS: DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN EMPIDONAX TRAILLII ADASTUS AND E. T. EXTIMUS

Overview of attention for article published in Ornithology, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN THE SONG OF WILLOW FLYCATCHERS: DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN EMPIDONAX TRAILLII ADASTUS AND E. T. EXTIMUS
Published in
Ornithology, January 2001
DOI 10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0366:gvitso]2.0.co;2
Authors

James A. Sedgwick

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ornithology
#560
of 2,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,686
of 114,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithology
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.