↓ Skip to main content

Hypnotic Treatment of Chronic Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Hypnotic Treatment of Chronic Pain
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, January 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10865-005-9031-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Jensen, David R. Patterson

Abstract

This article reviews controlled trials of hypnotic treatment for chronic pain in terms of: (1) analyses comparing the effects of hypnotic treatment to six types of control conditions; (2) component analyses; and (3) predictor analyses. The findings indicate that hypnotic analgesia produces significantly greater decreases in pain relative to no-treatment and to some non-hypnotic interventions such as medication management, physical therapy, and education/advice. However, the effects of self-hypnosis training on chronic pain tend to be similar, on average, to progressive muscle relaxation and autogenic training, both of which often include hypnotic-like suggestions. None of the published studies have compared hypnosis to an equally credible placebo or minimally effective pain treatment, therefore conclusions cannot yet be made about whether hypnotic analgesia treatment is specifically effective over and above its effects on patient expectancy. Component analyses indicate that labeling versus not labeling hypnosis treatment as hypnosis, or including versus not including hand-warming suggestions, have relatively little short-term impact on outcome, although the hypnosis label may have a long-term benefit. Predictor analyses suggest that global hypnotic responsivity and ability to experience vivid images are associated with treatment outcome in hypnosis, progressive relaxation, and autogenic training treatments. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the findings for future hypnosis research and for the clinical applications of hypnotic analgesia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 163 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 40 24%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 34 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#483
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,214
of 154,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.