↓ Skip to main content

Moving Coframes: II. Regularization and Theoretical Foundations

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 151)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
248 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Moving Coframes: II. Regularization and Theoretical Foundations
Published in
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, January 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1006195823000
Authors

Mark Fels, Peter J. Olver

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Researcher 3 11%
Professor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 12 44%
Physics and Astronomy 6 22%
Engineering 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Acta Applicandae Mathematicae
#19
of 151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,660
of 109,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Applicandae Mathematicae
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them