| Title |
California Porcini: Three New Taxa, Observations on Their Harvest, and the Tragedy of No Commons1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12231-008-9050-7 |
| Authors |
David Arora |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 24% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#277
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,529
of 91,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.