↓ Skip to main content

Humean laws and circular explanation

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Humean laws and circular explanation
Published in
Philosophical Studies, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0310-3
Authors

Michael Townsen Hicks, Peter van Elswyk

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 3 23%
Computer Science 2 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,254,575
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#1,092
of 1,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,477
of 223,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.