↓ Skip to main content

Horse sense: social status of horses (Equus caballus) affects their likelihood of copying other horses’ behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Horse sense: social status of horses (Equus caballus) affects their likelihood of copying other horses’ behavior
Published in
Animal Cognition, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10071-007-0133-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konstanze Krueger, Jürgen Heinze

Abstract

Animals that live in stable social groups need to gather information on their own relative position in the group's social hierarchy, by either directly threatening or by challenging others, or indirectly and in a less perilous manner , by observing interactions among others. Indirect inference of dominance relationships has previously been reported from primates, rats, birds, and fish. Here, we show that domestic horses, Equus caballus, are similarly capable of social cognition. Taking advantage of a specific "following behavior" that horses show towards humans in a riding arena, we investigated whether bystander horses adjust their response to an experimenter according to the observed interaction and their own dominance relationship with the horse whose reaction to the experimenter they had observed before. Horses copied the "following behavior" towards an experimenter after watching a dominant horse following but did not follow after observing a subordinate horse or a horse from another social group doing so. The "following behavior," which horses show towards an experimenter, therefore appears to be affected by the demonstrator's behavior and social status relative to the observer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Moldova, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 142 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Professor 12 8%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 39%
Psychology 26 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 5%
Engineering 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#969
of 1,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,905
of 156,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.