↓ Skip to main content

Dysmenorrhea in Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Drugs, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 583)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Dysmenorrhea in Adolescents
Published in
Pediatric Drugs, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/00148581-200810010-00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda French

Abstract

Dysmenorrhea occurs in the majority of adolescent girls and is the leading cause of recurrent short-term school absence in this group. In the vast majority of cases, a presumptive diagnosis of primary dysmenorrhea can be made based on a typical history of low anterior pelvic pain coinciding with the onset of menses and lasting 1-3 days with a negative physical examination. Risk factors for primary dysmenorrhea include nulliparity, heavy menstrual flow, and smoking. Poor mental health and social supports are other associations. Empiric therapy for primary dysmenorrhea can be initiated without diagnostic testing. Effective therapies include NSAIDs, oral contraceptives, and pharmacologic suppression of menstrual cycles. In atypical, severe, or refractory cases, imaging and/or laparoscopy should be performed to investigate secondary causes of dysmenorrhea. The most common cause of secondary dysmenorrhea is endometriosis, the treatment of which may include medical and surgical approaches. Pharmacologic treatment of young women with pain related to endometriosis is similar to treatment of primary dysmenorrhea but may infrequently include gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in severe refractory cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 149 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 17%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Researcher 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 51 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 58 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,120,592
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Drugs
#10
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,271
of 186,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Drugs
#4
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.