↓ Skip to main content

Use of neuroimaging measurements of optic nerve sheath diameter to assess intracranial pressure in craniosynostosis

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Use of neuroimaging measurements of optic nerve sheath diameter to assess intracranial pressure in craniosynostosis
Published in
Child's Nervous System, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00381-018-3728-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mostafa Haredy, Giulio Zuccoli, Mandeep Tamber, Amani Davis, Ken Nischal, Jesse A. Goldstein

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurements obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with craniosynostosis (CS) for detection of high intracranial pressure (ICP) and to correlate MRI-derived ONSD measurements with those obtained by computed tomography (CT) scans in CS patients. A retrospective review was conducted on CS patients who had MRI- and age-matched controls with normal MRI. Diagnosis of intracranial hypertension was based on presence of papilledema, direct ICP monitoring, and/or lumbar puncture. The search also included patients with MRI and CT done within 30 days apart. ONSDs were measured 3 mm behind the globe on both modalities. The study identified 56 CS patients (mean age 3.8 ± 3.47 years) and 49 controls (mean age 3.7 ± 3.62 years). Mean ONSD in patients with high ICP was significantly higher than in patients without high ICP (P = 0.0001) and in controls (P < 0.0001). The optimal ONSD threshold for predicting raised ICP in patients >1 year old was 6 mm (71.4% sensitivity, 89.7% specificity). Nineteen patients with 38 single-eye MRI/CT pairs were identified. Substantial agreement between both modalities resulted (r = 0.959, 95% CI 0.923-0.978), and Bland and Altman Plot analysis showed that 95% of measurements fell within limits of agreement (1.96 SD; ± 0.6 mm). In CS patients, ONSD measured by MRI represent indirect non-invasive means of ICP assessment. Both MRI and CT measurements of ONSD gave comparable results, and the use of CT-derived ONSD measurements may give some idea about ICP in CS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Neuroscience 8 18%
Engineering 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,929,042
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#1,225
of 2,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,653
of 441,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#25
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,802 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.