↓ Skip to main content

Observer-Relative Chances In Anthropic Reasoning?

Overview of attention for article published in Erkenntnis, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Observer-Relative Chances In Anthropic Reasoning?
Published in
Erkenntnis, January 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1005551304409
Authors

Nick Bostrom

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 6 46%
Physics and Astronomy 2 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Erkenntnis
#206
of 940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,910
of 109,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Erkenntnis
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 940 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them