| Title |
Effects of the Use of the Availability Heuristic on Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-008-9690-7 |
| Authors |
Sefa Hayibor, David M. Wasieleski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 24% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 60 | 40% |
| Psychology | 26 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,695,422
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#784
of 2,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,819
of 81,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.