| Title |
An analysis for the DIIS acceleration method used in quantum chemistry calculations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10910-011-9863-y |
| Authors |
Thorsten Rohwedder, Reinhold Schneider |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 35% |
| Researcher | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 49 | 46% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 20 | 19% |
| Mathematics | 10 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Chemistry
#17
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,148
of 124,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Chemistry
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them