| Title |
Use of Opioid Medications for Chronic Noncancer Pain Syndromes in Primary Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10435.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Carrington Reid, Laura L. Engles‐Horton, MaryAnn B. Weber, Robert D. Kerns, Elizabeth L. Rogers, Patrick G. O'Connor |
| Abstract |
To define the spectrum of chronic noncancer pain treated with opioid medications in 2 primary care settings, and the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity in this patient population. We also sought to determine the proportion of patients who manifested prescription opioid abuse behaviors and the factors associated with these behaviors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 42 | 22% |
| Unknown | 29 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 31% |
| Psychology | 31 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 36 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,918,972
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,453
of 8,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,796
of 49,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#11
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.