↓ Skip to main content

Biological permanent magnets

Overview of attention for article published in Hyperfine Interactions, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 280)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Biological permanent magnets
Published in
Hyperfine Interactions, December 2003
DOI 10.1023/b:hype.0000020407.25316.c3
Authors

Richard B. Frankel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Professor 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 23%
Chemistry 3 12%
Physics and Astronomy 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Hyperfine Interactions
#35
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,085
of 142,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hyperfine Interactions
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them