You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critiques of PVA Ask the Wrong Questions: Throwing the Heuristic Baby Out with the Numerical Bath Water
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01426.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barry W Brook, Mark A Burgman, H Resit Akçakaya, Julian J O'Grady, Richard Frankham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 16 | 4% |
| United States | 11 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 3% |
| Unknown | 318 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 116 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 10% |
| Professor | 28 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 75 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 225 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 87 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#2,473
of 3,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,994
of 123,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#41
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.