↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for Metabolic Provisioning by a Common Invertebrate Endosymbiont, Wolbachia pipientis, during Periods of Nutritional Stress

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Pathogens, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
312 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence for Metabolic Provisioning by a Common Invertebrate Endosymbiont, Wolbachia pipientis, during Periods of Nutritional Stress
Published in
PLoS Pathogens, April 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000368
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy C. Brownlie, Bodil N. Cass, Markus Riegler, Joris J. Witsenburg, Iñaki Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Elizabeth A. McGraw, Scott L. O'Neill

Abstract

Wolbachia are ubiquitous inherited endosymbionts of invertebrates that invade host populations by modifying host reproductive systems. However, some strains lack the ability to impose reproductive modification and yet are still capable of successfully invading host populations. To explain this paradox, theory predicts that such strains should provide a fitness benefit, but to date none has been detected. Recently completed genome sequences of different Wolbachia strains show that these bacteria may have the genetic machinery to influence iron utilization of hosts. Here we show that Wolbachia infection can confer a positive fecundity benefit for Drosophila melanogaster reared on iron-restricted or -overloaded diets. Furthermore, iron levels measured from field-collected flies indicated that nutritional conditions in the field were overall comparable to those of flies reared in the laboratory on restricted diets. These data suggest that Wolbachia may play a previously unrecognized role as nutritional mutualists in insects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 282 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 24%
Researcher 46 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Student > Master 34 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 48 16%
Unknown 47 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 150 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 17%
Environmental Science 11 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 54 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,831,776
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Pathogens
#2,637
of 9,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,260
of 111,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Pathogens
#12
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.