Title |
First Safety and Performance Evaluation of T45K, a Self-Assembling Peptide Barrier Hemostatic Device, After Skin Lesion Excision
|
---|---|
Published in |
Dermatologic Surgery, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1097/dss.0000000000001468 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
George Rahmani, Jayne Prats, Terrence Norchi, Steven Kates, Veronica McInerney, Jack Woods, Jack Kelly |
Abstract |
The self-assembling peptide barrier T45K (SAPB-T45K) is an oligopeptide that rapidly forms a biocompatible hemostatic barrier when applied to wounds. Evaluate safety and performance of SAPB-T45K in cutaneous surgery. In this single-blind study, after sequential shave excision of 2 lesions, wounds were randomized (intrapatient) to SAPB-T45K or control treatment. Safety was assessed at treatment, Day 7, and Day 30. Performance was evaluated using time to hemostasis (TTH) and ASEPSIS wound scores, with a subgroup analysis for patients with or without antiplatelet therapy. Each of 46 patients (10 [22%] with antiplatelet therapy) received randomized SAPB-T45K or control treatment for 2 wounds. Safety assessments were similar, and ASEPSIS scores reflected normal healing in both wound groups. SAPB-T45K demonstrated significantly faster median TTH (24.5 [range, 7-165] seconds) compared with control (44 [10-387] seconds), for a 41% median TTH reduction (18 [95% confidence interval, 7-35] seconds, p < .001). SAPB-T45K provided an identical median TTH of 24 seconds, regardless of antiplatelet therapy. Control median TTH was 90 and 40 seconds for patients taking or not taking antiplatelet therapy, respectively. SAPB-T45K provided significantly faster median TTH versus control, especially with antiplatelet therapy, and safety profiles were similar.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 22% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Librarian | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 15 | 56% |