↓ Skip to main content

Congenital minor malformations of the soft tissue and muscle of the philtrum with associated nasal deformity

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Plastic Surgery, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Congenital minor malformations of the soft tissue and muscle of the philtrum with associated nasal deformity
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, September 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00238-002-0375-7
Authors

S. Goossens, A. Wilk, C. Meyer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Lecturer 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Engineering 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#90
of 475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,341
of 45,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 475 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them