↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the limits of spatial memory in rats, using very large mazes

Overview of attention for article published in Learning & Behavior, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Exploring the limits of spatial memory in rats, using very large mazes
Published in
Learning & Behavior, November 2003
DOI 10.3758/bf03195996
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark R. Cole, Robyn Chappell-Stephenson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 6%
United Kingdom 2 6%
Hungary 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 23 74%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 55%
Psychology 3 10%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Learning & Behavior
#222
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,195
of 57,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning & Behavior
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them