↓ Skip to main content

EEG-like signals can be synthesized from surface representations of single motor units of facial muscles

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
EEG-like signals can be synthesized from surface representations of single motor units of facial muscles
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00221-018-5194-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gizem Yilmaz, Pekcan Ungan, Kemal S. Türker

Abstract

Electrodes for recording electroencephalogram (EEG) are placed on or around cranial muscles; hence, their electrical activity may contaminate the EEG signal even at rest conditions. Due to its role in maintaining mandibular posture, tonic activity of temporalis muscle interferes with the EEG signal particularly at fronto-temporal locations at single motor unit (SMU) level. By obtaining surface representation of a motor unit, we can evaluate its interference in EEG and if we could sum surface representations of several tonically active motor units, we could estimate the overall myogenic contamination in EEG. Therefore, in this study, we followed re-composition (RC) approach and generated EEG-like artefact model using surface representations of single motor units (RC). Furthermore, we compared signal characteristics of RC signals with simultaneously recorded EEG signal at different locations in terms of power spectral density and coherence. First, we found that RC signal represented the power spectral distribution of an EMG signal. Second, RC signal reflected the discharge rate of a SMU giving the greatest surface representation amplitude and strongest interference appeared as distinguishable frequency peak on RC power spectra. Moreover, for strong interferences, RC also contaminated the EEG at F7 and other EEG electrodes. These findings are important to illustrate the susceptibility of EEG signal to myogenic artefacts even at rest and the research using EEG coherence comparisons should consider muscle activity while drawing conclusions about neuronal interactions and oscillations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Linguistics 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#12,945,774
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#1,481
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,874
of 437,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#19
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.