↓ Skip to main content

Penrose tilings as coverings of congruent decagons

Overview of attention for article published in Geometriae Dedicata, August 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 265)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Penrose tilings as coverings of congruent decagons
Published in
Geometriae Dedicata, August 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00239998
Authors

Petra Gummelt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 15%
Researcher 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 8 30%
Physics and Astronomy 8 30%
Mathematics 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,729,343
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from Geometriae Dedicata
#25
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,424
of 29,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geometriae Dedicata
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them