↓ Skip to main content

The association between neuroblastoma and opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome: a historical review

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
The association between neuroblastoma and opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome: a historical review
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00247-009-1282-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexis B. Rothenberg, Walter E. Berdon, Giulio J. D’Angio, Darrell J. Yamashiro, Robert A. Cowles

Abstract

An association between neuroblastoma and opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (OMS) was described as early as 1927 within the first report on the transformation of malignant neuroblastoma to a benign ganglioneuroma. It was not recognized at that time nor was it appreciated in the subsequent follow-up report on the same patient in 1959. Myoclonic encephalopathy of infancy, an alternative name for OMS, was described by a pediatric neurologist in 1962; however, its connection to neuroblastoma was not known. It was only in 1968 that the association between these two conditions was first reported. The neuroblastoma tumors associated with OMS are almost all small, stage I-II with no associated MYCN amplification or metastases. OMS occurs in 2-3% of patients with neuroblastoma, but neuroblastoma is found in as many as 50% of children who present with OMS. Nearly 100% of the children with neuroblastoma associated with OMS survive, and this has led to speculation that the OMS is a result of an autoimmune process, not metastases. Affected children are treated with steroids, ACTH, or intravenous immunoglobulin, but many have persistent neurologic and developmental deficits. Using the original case reported in 1927, we summarize a century of literature in this review on OMS and its association with neuroblastoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 17%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 13 31%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,597,321
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#391
of 2,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,002
of 92,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.