↓ Skip to main content

Insights into the pathogenesis and management of thrombosis in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia

Overview of attention for article published in Internal and Emergency Medicine, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Insights into the pathogenesis and management of thrombosis in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11739-009-0319-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro M. Vannucchi

Abstract

The classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) include polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia; their molecular basis has been described only recently with the demonstration of recurrent mutations in JAK2 or MPL. While life expectancy may not be significantly shortened, arterial and venous thrombosis constitute the major causes of morbidity and mortality, together with disease evolution to myelofibrosis or transformation to acute leukemia. Therapy is currently aimed at reducing the rate of thrombosis without increasing the risk of hematologic transformation by inappropriate exposure to cytotoxic drugs. Nevertheless, the mechanism(s) finally responsible for the increased thrombotic tendency have not been clearly elucidated, although risk factors for thrombosis have been identified, and are currently employed for stratifying patients to the most appropriate therapeutic options. Abnormalities of blood cells, activation of neutrophils and platelets, and a hypercoagulability state, can all act in conjunction to lead to thrombosis. Intriguing data also point to the JAK2V617F mutation as both a marker and a mechanism for thrombosis. Better knowledge in the pathophysiology of these disorders, and the introduction of molecularly targeted drugs in clinical trials, anticipate the possibility of more specific and efficacious treatment of classic MPN, particularly as concerns the reduction of risk associated with vascular events.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,682,780
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#239
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,300
of 92,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them