You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Whole-genome and multisector exome sequencing of primary and post-treatment glioblastoma reveals patterns of tumor evolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Research, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1101/gr.180612.114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hoon Kim, Siyuan Zheng, Seyed S. Amini, Selene M. Virk, Tom Mikkelsen, Daniel J. Brat, Jonna Grimsby, Carrie Sougnez, Florian Muller, Jian Hu, Andrew E. Sloan, Mark L. Cohen, Erwin G. Van Meir, Lisa Scarpace, Peter W. Laird, John N. Weinstein, Eric S. Lander, Stacey Gabriel, Gad Getz, Matthew Meyerson, Lynda Chin, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan, Roel G.W. Verhaak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 24 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 14 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 418 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 396 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 22% |
| Researcher | 89 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 66 | 16% |
| Unknown | 77 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 108 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 8% |
| Unknown | 86 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,085,563
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genome Research
#397
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,415
of 366,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Research
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.