| Title |
Efficacy of modified diatomaceous earth on different cockroach species (Orthoptera, Blattellidae) and silverfish (Thysanura, Lepismatidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pest Science, May 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10340-006-0127-8 |
| Authors |
M. K. Faulde, M. Tisch, J. J. Scharninghausen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,459,396
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pest Science
#46
of 529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,789
of 65,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pest Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them