↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of Usher syndrome type I gene mutations in an Usher syndrome patient population

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Characterization of Usher syndrome type I gene mutations in an Usher syndrome patient population
Published in
Human Genetics, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00439-004-1227-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao Mei Ouyang, Denise Yan, Li Lin Du, J. Fielding. Hejtmancik, Samuel G. Jacobson, Walter E. Nance, An Ren Li, Simon Angeli, Muriel Kaiser, Valerie Newton, Steve D. M. Brown, Thomas Balkany, Xue Zhong Liu

Abstract

Usher syndrome type I (USH1), the most severe form of this syndrome, is characterized by profound congenital sensorineural deafness, vestibular dysfunction, and retinitis pigmentosa. At least seven USH1 loci, USH1A-G, have been mapped to the chromosome regions 14q32, 11q13.5, 11p15, 10q21-q22, 21q21, 10q21-q22, and 17q24-25, respectively. Mutations in five genes, including MYO7A, USH1C, CDH23, PCDH15 and SANS, have been shown to be the cause of Usher syndrome type 1B, type 1C, type 1D, type 1F and type 1G, respectively. In the present study, we carried out a systematic mutation screening of these genes in USH1 patients from USA and from UK. We identified a total of 27 different mutations; of these, 19 are novel, including nine missense, two nonsense, four deletions, one insertion and three splicing defects. Approximatelly 35-39% of the observed mutations involved the USH1B and USH1D genes, followed by 11% for USH1F and 7% for USH1C in non-Acadian alleles and 7% for USH1G. Two of the 12 MYO7A mutations, R666X and IVS40-1G > T accounted for 38% of the mutations at that locus. A 193delC mutation accounted for 26% of CDH23 (USH1D) mutations, confirming its high frequency. The most common PCDH15 (USH1F) mutation in this study, 5601-5603delAAC, accounts for 33% of mutant alleles. Interestingly, a novel SANS mutation, W38X, was observed only in the USA cohort. The present study suggests that mutations in MYO7A and CDH23 are the two major components of causes for USH1, while PCDH15, USH1C, and SANS are less frequent causes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 73 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Other 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#933
of 2,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,579
of 141,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.