| Title |
Should We Perform an Immediate Coronary Angiogram in All Patients After Cardiac Arrest? Insights From a Large French Registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wulfran Bougouin, Florence Dumas, Nicole Karam, Carole Maupain, Eloi Marijon, Lionel Lamhaut, Daniel Jost, Guillaume Geri, Frankie Beganton, Olivier Varenne, Christian Spaulding, Xavier Jouven, Alain Cariou, Sudden Death Expertise Center, F. Adnet, J.M. Agostinucci, N. Aissaoui-Balanant, J. Albuisson, V. Algalarrondo, F. Alla, D. Annane, C. Antoine, P. Aubry, E. Azoulay, F. Beganton, D. Benhamou, W. Bougouin, C. Bruel, A. Cariou, P. Carli, C. Cerf, A. Chaib, J. Chastre, Y. Cohen, A. Combes, C. Cornaglia, D. Da Silva, V. Das, A. Demoule, N. Deye, G. Dhonneur, J.L. Diehl, S. Dinanian, L. Domanski, D. Dreyfuss, D. Duboc, J.L. Dubois-Rande, O. Dubourg, F.X. Duchateau, F. Dumas, J.P. Empana, F. Extramiana, J.Y. Fagon, M. Fartoukh, C. Fenioux, F. Fieux, F. Fraisse, M. Gabbas, E. Gandjbakhch, B. Guidet, P. Henry, F. Hidden Lucet, P. Jabre, L. Jacob, L. Joseph, D. Jost, D. Journois, X. Jouven, N. Karam, H. Kassim, K. Lahlou-Laforet, L. Lamhaut, A. Lanceleur, O. Langeron, V. Lanoe, E. Lecarpentier, A. Leenhardt, N. Lellouche, V. Lemiale, F. Linval, T. Loeb, B. Ludes, A. Maltret, N. Mansouri, J. Mantz, E. Marijon, J. Marty, E. Maury, V. Maxime, A. Mekontso-Dessaps, J.P. Mira, X. Monnet, M.C. Perier, O. Piot, R. Pirraccchio, I. Plu, M. Raux, F. Revaux, J.D. Ricard, C. Richard, B. Riou, F. Roussin, F. Santoli, F. Schortgen, T. Sharshar, G. Sideris, C. Spaulding, J.L. Teboul, J.F. Timsit, J.P. Tourtier, P. Tuppin, C. Ursat, O. Varenne, A. Vieillard-Baron, S. Voicu, K. Wahbi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 24% |
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Sudan | 1 | 3% |
| Qatar | 1 | 3% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 72% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,052,577
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#383
of 4,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,434
of 455,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#9
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.