↓ Skip to main content

A mutational hot spot in keratin 10 (KRT 10) in patients with epidermolytic hyperkeratosis.

Overview of attention for article published in Human Molecular Genetics, January 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A mutational hot spot in keratin 10 (KRT 10) in patients with epidermolytic hyperkeratosis.
Published in
Human Molecular Genetics, January 1993
DOI 10.1093/hmg/2.12.2147
Pubmed ID
Authors

J A Rothnagel, M P Fisher, S M Axtell, M R Pittelkow, I Anton-Lamprecht, M Huber, D Hohl, D R Roop

Abstract

Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EHK), (bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma), is an autosomal dominant human skin disorder. Recently, we and others have described mutations in keratins 1 and 10 (K1 and K10) in patients with this disease. Structure-function models predict that these mutations would impair normal filament assembly and function. We have extended our earlier studies to include 8 more incidences of EHK. In half of these families, we were unable to locate a mutation within the rod domains of either K1 or K10. However, polymorphic restriction site and sequence analysis of the other families revealed a mutational hot spot within the 1A alpha-helical segment of K10. These involve Arginine to Histidine, Arginine to Cysteine and Arginine to Leucine substitutions at residue 10 of the rod domain. Interestingly, mutations in the corresponding Arginine residue in keratin K14 have been identified in patients with epidermolysis bullosa simplex. The large number of mutations found at this position in both keratins K10 and K14 suggests that other epithelia cell disorders will be discovered that are caused by the corresponding mutation in related type I keratin genes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2008.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Human Molecular Genetics
#3,733
of 8,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,985
of 65,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Molecular Genetics
#65
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.