| Title |
The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Highly Trained Athletes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabiha Gati, Sanjay Sharma, Dudley Pennell |
| Abstract |
Exercise-associated benefits on the cardiovascular systems are well established. Although exercise-associated sudden cardiac death is rare, most deaths in young athletes are due to hereditary or congenital cardiac diseases. Athletic adaptation itself is associated with several structural changes that overlap those observed in individuals with cardiomyopathies, often leading to dilemmas for the clinician regarding life-changing decisions including advice against competitive sports participation. Cardiac magnetic resonance plays an increasingly important role in helping to establish an accurate diagnosis in these individuals. This review highlights the role of cardiac magnetic resonance in differentiating physiological adaptation in athletes from pathology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 22 | 15% |
| United States | 15 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 6 | 4% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Peru | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 47 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 92 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 21% |
| Scientists | 13 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2018.
All research outputs
#509,096
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#104
of 2,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,910
of 451,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#3
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.