↓ Skip to main content

Identification practices in government: citizen surveillance and the quest for public service improvement

Overview of attention for article published in Identity in the Information Society, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Identification practices in government: citizen surveillance and the quest for public service improvement
Published in
Identity in the Information Society, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12394-009-0007-5
Authors

John A. Taylor, Miriam Lips, Joe Organ

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 41%
Student > Master 6 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 30%
Computer Science 8 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 14%
Arts and Humanities 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Identity in the Information Society
#16
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,059
of 94,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Identity in the Information Society
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.