↓ Skip to main content

A review of diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact from the focused use of perioperative ultrasound

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
A review of diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact from the focused use of perioperative ultrasound
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12630-018-1067-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Bainbridge, Brie McConnell, Colin Royse

Abstract

To perform a narrative review of the current trials examining the use of perioperative ultrasound to diagnose common issues related to the heart, lungs, stomach, and airway. A review of the current literature was conducted in June 2017 on all trials involving ultrasound, including both surface and transesophageal ultrasound, in the perioperative period. The search included the terms 'ultrasonography', 'perioperative care', 'point-of-care', and 'bedside'. Trials were limited to human subjects with no language or time restrictions being applied. The results were then collected and a narrative review was completed with the available information. In total 1,176 reports of original investigation or systematic reviews were collected and reviewed. Of those 1,176 reports and reviews, a total of 80 original articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. Topics were broadly defined based on common themes emerging from the literature including cardiac disease, lung pathology (pneumothorax, pleural effusion, pulmonary edema, and pulmonary consolidation), volume and contents of the stomach, confirmation of endotracheal tube position, confirmation of lung isolation, and the application of ultrasound for guiding cricothyroidotomy. Where possible, the sensitivity and specificity of the trials are presented. Few trials reported on patient outcomes, although several discussed provider outcomes such as a change in anesthesia practice. In addition, trials reporting outcomes, although few in number, were included. Perioperative point-of-care ultrasound is a useful method for the diagnosis of many important perioperative conditions. The impact of this diagnostic approach on patient outcomes however remains to be determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,050,172
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#482
of 2,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,800
of 448,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#14
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.