↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of aromatherapy for reducing pain during labor: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of aromatherapy for reducing pain during labor: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00404-018-4700-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajavadi Tanvisut, Kuntharee Traisrisilp, Theera Tongsong

Abstract

Many strategies for labor pain management have been studied, including aromatherapy, which is a noninvasive, alternative medicine used as an adjunct for labor pain control. Nevertheless, the results were contradictory. Therefore, we conducted this study to determine the effectiveness of aromatherapy for reducing pain during labor. A randomized controlled trial was carried out on Thai laboring primigravidae who were a low-risk singleton pregnancy undergoing vaginal delivery. All participants, both study and control group, received standard obstetric care. Aromatherapy was only provided to the study group during the first stage of labor. The women rated their pain intensity by rating scales at different stages of labor. The primary outcome was pain scores and the secondary outcomes were necessity of painkiller usage, labor time, aromatherapy-associated complications, route of delivery, and Apgar scores. A total of 104 women were recruited, 52 in each group. Baseline characteristics and baseline pain scores were comparable. The median pain score of latent and early active phase was lower in the aromatherapy group, 5 vs 6 and 7 vs 8, respectively. The mean differences of pain scores between latent and early active phase and the baseline were significantly lower in the aromatherapy group, 1.88 vs 2.6 (p = 0.010) and 3.82 vs 4.39 (p = 0.031), respectively. Late active phase pain scores and other perinatal outcomes were not significantly different. Aromatherapy is helpful in reducing pain in latent and early active phase, and can probably be used as an adjunctive method for labor pain control without serious side effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 312 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 13%
Student > Master 29 9%
Researcher 15 5%
Other 12 4%
Unspecified 11 4%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 165 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 88 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 8%
Unspecified 11 4%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 163 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,998,480
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#171
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,164
of 442,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.