↓ Skip to main content

Role of dystrophin and utrophin for assembly and function of the dystrophin glycoprotein complex in non-muscle tissue

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Role of dystrophin and utrophin for assembly and function of the dystrophin glycoprotein complex in non-muscle tissue
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00018-005-5461-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Haenggi, J. -M. Fritschy

Abstract

The dystrophin glycoprotein complex (DGC) is a multimeric protein assembly associated with either the X-linked cytoskeletal protein dystrophin or its autosomal homologue utrophin. In striated muscle cells, the DGC links the extracellular matrix to the actin cytoskeleton and mediates three major functions: structural stability of the plasma membrane, ion homeostasis, and transmembrane signaling. Mutations affecting the DGC underlie major forms of congenital muscle dystrophies. The DGC is prominent also in the central and peripheral nervous system and in tissues with a secretory function or which form barriers between functional compartments, such as the blood-brain barrier, choroid plexus, or kidney. A considerable molecular heterogeneity arises from cell-specific expression of its constituent proteins, notably short C-terminal isoforms of dystrophin. Experimentally, the generation of mice carrying targeted gene deletions affecting the DGC has clarified the interdependence of DGC proteins for assembly of the complex and revealed its importance for brain development and regulation of the 'milieu intérieur. Here, we focus on recent studies of the DGC in brain, blood-brain barrier and choroid plexus, retina, and kidney and discuss the role of dystrophin isoforms and utrophin for assembly of the complex in these tissues.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 157 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 21%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Professor 6 4%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 22%
Neuroscience 19 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 25 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2,292
of 6,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,791
of 88,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#22
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.