↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanics of the sarcolemma and costameres in single skeletal muscle fibers from normal and dystrophin-null mice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Biomechanics of the sarcolemma and costameres in single skeletal muscle fibers from normal and dystrophin-null mice
Published in
Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10974-011-9238-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. P. García-Pelagio, R. J. Bloch, A. Ortega, H. González-Serratos

Abstract

We studied the biomechanical properties of the sarcolemma and its links through costameres to the contractile apparatus in single mammalian myofibers of Extensor digitorum longus muscles isolated from wild (WT) and dystrophin-null (mdx) mice. Suction pressures (P) applied through a pipette to the sarcolemma generated a bleb, the height of which increased with increasing P. Larger increases in P broke the connections between the sarcolemma and myofibrils and eventually caused the sarcolemma to burst. We used the values of P at which these changes occurred to estimate the tensions and stiffness of the system and its individual elements. Tensions of the whole system and the sarcolemma, as well as the maximal tension sustained by the costameres, were all significantly lower (1.8-3.3 fold) in muscles of mdx mice compared to WT. Values of P at which separation and bursting occurred, as well as the stiffness of the whole system and of the isolated sarcolemma, were ~2-fold lower in mdx than in WT. Our results indicate that the absence of dystrophin reduces muscle stiffness, increases sarcolemmal deformability, and compromises the mechanical stability of costameres and their connections to nearby myofibrils.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
France 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 53 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Researcher 11 19%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 20%
Engineering 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Physics and Astronomy 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,740,179
of 23,539,593 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility
#71
of 298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,814
of 187,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,539,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 298 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them