↓ Skip to main content

Quasispecies and virus

Overview of attention for article published in European Biophysics Journal, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 498)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Quasispecies and virus
Published in
European Biophysics Journal, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00249-018-1282-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esteban Domingo, Celia Perales

Abstract

Quasispecies theory has been instrumental in the understanding of RNA virus population dynamics because it considered for the first time mutation as an integral part of the replication process. The key influences of quasispecies theory on experimental virology have been: (1) to disclose the mutant spectrum nature of viral populations and to evaluate its consequences; (2) to unveil collective properties of genome ensembles that can render a mutant spectrum a unit of selection; and (3) to identify new vulnerability points of pathogenic RNA viruses on three fronts: the need to apply multiple selective constraints (in the form of drug combinations) to minimize selection of treatment-escape variants, to translate the error threshold concept into antiviral designs, and to construct attenuated vaccine viruses through alterations of viral polymerase copying fidelity or through displacements of viral genomes towards unfavorable regions of sequence space. These three major influences on the understanding of viral pathogens preceded extensions of quasispecies to non-viral systems such as bacterial and tumor cell collectivities and prions. These developments are summarized here.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 23 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,128,325
of 23,538,320 outputs
Outputs from European Biophysics Journal
#2
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,708
of 441,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Biophysics Journal
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,538,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them