↓ Skip to main content

Phylogeny of korean rubus (rosaceae) based on its (nrDNA) and trnL/F intergenic region (cpdna)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Biology, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 100)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Phylogeny of korean rubus (rosaceae) based on its (nrDNA) and trnL/F intergenic region (cpdna)
Published in
Journal of Plant Biology, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/bf03030787
Authors

Ji Young Yang, Jae-Hong Pak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Czechia 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 24 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 56%
Environmental Science 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Energy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Biology
#19
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,669
of 154,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Biology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them