| Title |
Histopathology: ditch the slides, because digital and 3D are on show
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00345-018-2202-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilaria Jansen, Marit Lucas, C. Dilara Savci-Heijink, Sybren L. Meijer, Henk A. Marquering, Daniel M. de Bruin, Patricia J. Zondervan |
| Abstract |
Due to the growing field of digital pathology, more and more digital histology slides are becoming available. This improves the accessibility, allows teleconsultations from specialized pathologists, improves education, and might give urologist the possibility to review the slides in patient management systems. Moreover, by stacking multiple two-dimensional (2D) digital slides, three-dimensional volumes can be created, allowing improved insight in the growth pattern of a tumor. With the addition of computer-aided diagnosis systems, pathologist can be guided to regions of interest, potentially reducing the workload and interobserver variation. Digital (3D) pathology has the potential to improve dialog between the pathologist and urologist, and, therefore, results in a better treatment selection for urologic patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 43% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Morocco | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 30% |
| Engineering | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,342,086
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#46
of 2,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,315
of 452,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#3
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.