↓ Skip to main content

Human antimicrobial proteins in ear wax

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 2,844)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Human antimicrobial proteins in ear wax
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10096-011-1185-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Schwaab, A. Gurr, A. Neumann, S. Dazert, A. Minovi

Abstract

The external auditory canal is vulnerable to bacterial infections, but little is known about thechemical compositions of ear wax regarding antimicrobial peptides. We, therefore, studied the proteinconcentrations of ten well-known human antimicrobial peptides from ear wax.Twenty ear wax samples from healthy individuals were analysed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine theprotein concentrations of the antimicrobial peptides hBD1-3, lactoferrin, LL-37, BPI, hSLPI and HNP1-3. All ten antimicrobial peptides are present in ear wax. Some of these proteins seem to be merelycell-bound in ear wax. Antimicrobial peptides in ear wax prevent bacteria and fungi from causing infections inthe external auditory canal. The role and importance of these proteins for the blind-ending ear externalcanal is discussed. If this local defence system fails, infections of the external auditory canal may result.The knowledge about the presence of antimicrobial peptides in cerumen may lead to new concepts ofthe local treatment of external auditory canal diseases in the future.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 22%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Unspecified 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#687,029
of 23,730,866 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#31
of 2,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,115
of 188,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,730,866 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.