↓ Skip to main content

Stochastic Resonance: A remarkable idea that changed our perception of noise

Overview of attention for article published in Journal de Physique I, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Stochastic Resonance: A remarkable idea that changed our perception of noise
Published in
Journal de Physique I, May 2009
DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00163-x
Authors

L. Gammaitoni, P. Hänggi, P. Jung, F. Marchesoni

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 122 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 28%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Master 11 8%
Professor 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 8%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 38 29%
Engineering 23 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 21 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique I
#362
of 1,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,001
of 103,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique I
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.