↓ Skip to main content

Arthrogryposis, renal dysfunction and cholestasis syndrome: Report of five patients from three Italian families

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, October 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Arthrogryposis, renal dysfunction and cholestasis syndrome: Report of five patients from three Italian families
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, October 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01959793
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Di Rocco, F. Callea, B. Pollice, M. Faraci, F. Campiani, C. Borrone

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2007.
All research outputs
#8,521,581
of 25,389,520 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,763
of 4,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,986
of 22,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.