↓ Skip to main content

2q37 as a Susceptibility Locus for Idiopathic Basal Ganglia Calcification (IBGC) in a Large South Tyrolean Family

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
2q37 as a Susceptibility Locus for Idiopathic Basal Ganglia Calcification (IBGC) in a Large South Tyrolean Family
Published in
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12031-009-9287-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Béu Volpato, Alessandro De Grandi, Ebba Buffone, Maurizio Facheris, Uwe Gebert, Günther Schifferle, Rudolf Schönhuber, Andrew Hicks, Peter P. Pramstaller

Abstract

Familial idiopathic basal ganglia calcification (FIBGC) is an inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the accumulation of calcium deposits in different brain regions, particularly in the basal ganglia. FIBGC usually follows an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. Despite the mapping to chromosome 14q of a susceptibility locus for IBGC (IBCG1) in one family, this locus has been excluded in several others, demonstrating genetic heterogeneity in this disorder. The etiology of this disorder thus remains largely unknown. Using a large extended multigenerational Italian family from South Tyrol with 17 affected in a total of 56 members, we performed a genome-wide linkage analysis in which we were able to exclude linkage to the IBCG1 locus on chromosome 14q and obtain evidence of a novel locus on chromosome 2q37. Electronic supplementary material. The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12031-009-9287-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Denmark 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Psychology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,415,054
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#102
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,838
of 105,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.