↓ Skip to main content

Characterization and cancer risk assessment of VOCs in home and school environments in gran La Plata, Argentina

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Characterization and cancer risk assessment of VOCs in home and school environments in gran La Plata, Argentina
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-1265-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorge Esteban Colman Lerner, Maria de los Angeles Gutierrez, Daniela Mellado, Daniela Giuliani, Laura Massolo, Erica Yanina Sanchez, Andres Porta

Abstract

Three areas are highlighted in Gran La Plata, Argentina: industrial, urban, and residential. In this work, the levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in indoor air of homes and schools in those areas were analyzed, through the use of passive monitors. The study period is between 2007 and 2010. Higher levels of VOCs were found in homes and schools in the industrial zone, higher than the levels corresponding to urban and residential. Taking into account the relationship between indoor and outdoor levels of VOCs, they have ratios (I/O) between 1.5 and 10 are evidenced contributions of emission sources of VOCs both indoor and outdoor. Complementarily, we estimated the life time cancer risk (LCR) for benzene, styrene, trichloroethylene, and tetrachloroethylene in children who spend their time mostly in such indoor environments. The results show high LCR values for benzene, which exceed acceptable values for the US EPA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Master 4 7%
Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 24 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 12%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Chemical Engineering 3 5%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 29 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,013,132
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#3,169
of 10,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,316
of 453,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#77
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,730 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.