| Chapter title |
Isolation and Functional Characterization of Siderophore-Producing Lead- and Cadmium-Resistant Pseudomonas putida KNP9
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Microbiology, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00284-004-4459-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manishi Tripathi, Hitendra P. Munot, Yogesh Shouche, Jean Marie Meyer, Reeta Goel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,545,385
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Current Microbiology
#491
of 2,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,467
of 58,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Microbiology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.