↓ Skip to main content

Effects of temperature and precipitation on grassland bird nesting success as mediated by patch size

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of temperature and precipitation on grassland bird nesting success as mediated by patch size
Published in
Conservation Biology, April 2018
DOI 10.1111/cobi.13089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Zuckerberg, Christine A. Ribic, Lisa A. McCauley

Abstract

Grassland birds are declining faster than any other guild of bird species across North America. Shrinking ranges and population declines have been attributed to widespread habitat loss and increasingly fragmented landscapes of agriculture and other land-use practices that are misaligned with grassland bird conservation. Concurrent with habitat loss and degradation, temperate grasslands have experienced disproportionally faster rates of climate change compared to other terrestrial biomes. Grassland bird distributions and abundances often correlate with gradients in climate, but few studies have explored the consequences of weather on the demography of multiple grassland birds inhabiting a range of grassland fragments. To do so, we modeled the effects of temperature and precipitation on nesting success rates for a dozen grassland bird species comprising 21,000 nests from 81 individual studies across North America. We found that higher amounts of precipitation in the preceding year (bioyear) were associated with higher nesting success, but wetter conditions during the active breeding season reduced nesting success. In terms of temperature, extreme cold and hot springs were associated with lower rates of nesting success. Notably, the direct and indirect influence of temperature and precipitation on nesting success was moderated by grassland patch size. The positive effects of bioyear precipitation on nesting success were strongest for birds occupying smaller grassland patches, with little effect in larger grasslands. Conversely, warmer spring temperatures reduced nesting success in small grassland patches, but increased nesting success in the larger grasslands. Mechanisms underlying these differences may be patch-size induced variation in microclimates and predator activity. While the exact cause is not clear, large grassland patches, the most common metric of grassland conservation, appears to moderate the consequences of weather on grassland bird demography and could be an effective component of climate change adaptation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 21%
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Other 9 6%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 45%
Environmental Science 32 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 38 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,814,773
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,039
of 3,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,908
of 330,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.