↓ Skip to main content

Distinct manifestation of cognitive deficits associate with different resting-state network disruptions in non-demented patients with Parkinson’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Distinct manifestation of cognitive deficits associate with different resting-state network disruptions in non-demented patients with Parkinson’s disease
Published in
Journal of Neurology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00415-018-8755-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuya Kawabata, Hirohisa Watanabe, Kazuhiro Hara, Epifanio Bagarinao, Noritaka Yoneyama, Aya Ogura, Kazunori Imai, Michihito Masuda, Takamasa Yokoi, Reiko Ohdake, Yasuhiro Tanaka, Takashi Tsuboi, Tomohiko Nakamura, Masaaki Hirayama, Mizuki Ito, Naoki Atsuta, Satoshi Maesawa, Shinji Naganawa, Masahisa Katsuno, Gen Sobue

Abstract

Cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease (PD) are heterogeneous entities, but a relationship between the heterogeneity of cognitive deficits and resting-state network (RSN) changes remains elusive. In this study, we examined five sub-domain scores according to Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) for the cognitive evaluation and classification of 72 non-demented patients with PD. Twenty-eight patients were classified as PD with normal cognition (PD-NC). The remaining 44 were subdivided into the following 2 groups using a hierarchical cluster analysis: 20 with a predominant decrease in memory (PD with amnestic cognitive deficits: PD-A) and 24 with good memory who exhibited a decrease in other sub-domains (PD with non-amnestic cognitive deficits: PD-NA). We used an independent component analysis of RS-fMRI data to investigate the inter-group differences of RSN. Compared to the controls, the PD-A showed lower FC within the ventral default mode network (vDMN) and the visuospatial network. On the other hand, the PD-NA showed lower FC within the visual networks and the cerebellum-brainstem network. Significant differences in the FC within the vDMN and cerebellum-brainstem network were observed between the PD-A and PD-NA, which provided a good discrimination between PD-A and PD-NA using a support vector machine. Distinct patterns of cognitive deficits correspond to different RSN changes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 22 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Computer Science 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 26 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,585,544
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,684
of 4,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,676
of 440,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#72
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.