↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Evolution and Phylogeny of Elapid Snake Venom Three-Finger Toxins

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
310 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular Evolution and Phylogeny of Elapid Snake Venom Three-Finger Toxins
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, July 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00239-003-2461-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. G. Fry, W. Wüster, R. M. Kini, V. Brusic, A. Khan, D. Venkataraman, A. P. Rooney

Abstract

Animal venom components are of considerable interest to researchers across a wide variety of disciplines, including molecular biology, biochemistry, medicine, and evolutionary genetics. The three-finger family of snake venom peptides is a particularly interesting and biochemically complex group of venom peptides, because they are encoded by a large multigene family and display a diverse array of functional activities. In addition, understanding how this complex and highly varied multigene family evolved is an interesting question to researchers investigating the biochemical diversity of these peptides and their impact on human health. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to investigate the long-term evolutionary patterns exhibited by these snake venom toxins to understand the mechanisms by which they diversified into a large, biochemically diverse, multigene family. Our results show a much greater diversity of family members than was previously known, including a number of subfamilies that did not fall within any previously identified groups with characterized activities. In addition, we found that the long-term evolutionary processes that gave rise to the diversity of three-finger toxins are consistent with the birth-and-death model of multigene family evolution. It is anticipated that this "three-finger toxin toolkit" will prove to be useful in providing a clearer picture of the diversity of investigational ligands or potential therapeutics available within this important family.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 9 3%
United States 6 2%
Netherlands 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 323 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 19%
Student > Bachelor 55 15%
Student > Master 54 15%
Researcher 50 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 70 19%
Unknown 38 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 201 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 11%
Chemistry 11 3%
Environmental Science 10 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 51 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#516
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,189
of 54,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.