↓ Skip to main content

Decision tree supported substructure prediction of metabolites from GC-MS profiles

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolomics, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
276 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Decision tree supported substructure prediction of metabolites from GC-MS profiles
Published in
Metabolomics, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11306-010-0198-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Hummel, Nadine Strehmel, Joachim Selbig, Dirk Walther, Joachim Kopka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 231 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 26%
Researcher 44 18%
Student > Master 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 35 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 41%
Chemistry 35 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 11%
Engineering 13 5%
Computer Science 11 4%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 43 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#548
of 1,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,749
of 105,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.