↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral dihydrocodeine and its acid metabolites

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, May 1983
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral dihydrocodeine and its acid metabolites
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, May 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf01037958
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. J. Rowell, R. A. Seymour, M. D. Rawlins

Abstract

Serum concentrations of dihydrocodeine and its acid metabolites have been determined in seven human volunteers (6 male) who received the drug orally (30 mg and 60 mg) and intravenously (30 mg) on separate occasions, and in twenty-four patients (12 male) receiving 25 mg or 50 mg of the drug intravenously. The concentrations were estimated by radioimmunoassay on reconstituted extracts from serum after an extraction process which effectively separates dihydrocodeine from its polar acidic metabolites. The intravenous data show that dihydrocodeine kinetics followed a two-compartment distribution model. The concentration curves after oral administration indicated relatively rapid absorption with mean peak concentrations at 1.6 h-1.8 h. The mean half-lives varied between 3.3 h-4.5 h. From the AUC, the mean bioavailability of orally administered drug was 21% (range 12-34%). The peak levels of the acidic metabolites occurred between 1.8 h-2.0 h after oral administration and 2.2 h-2.5 h after i.v. administration, and they were significantly greater after oral administration. The low bioavailability of dihydrocodeine, together with the earlier and higher plasma levels of the acid metabolites after oral administration is suggestive of substantial first-pass metabolism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Chemistry 2 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#824
of 2,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,081
of 7,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.