↓ Skip to main content

Solar Wind Electron Proton Alpha Monitor (SWEPAM) for the Advanced Composition Explorer

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, July 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
909 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Solar Wind Electron Proton Alpha Monitor (SWEPAM) for the Advanced Composition Explorer
Published in
Space Science Reviews, July 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1005040232597
Authors

D.J. McComas, S.J. Bame, P. Barker, W.C. Feldman, J.L. Phillips, P. Riley, J.W. Griffee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Researcher 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Unknown 52 95%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#614
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,613
of 33,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.