| Title |
Calcineurin and synaptophysin in the human spinal cord of normal individuals and patients with familial dysautonomia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, April 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00294243 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Goto, A. Hirano, J. Pearson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Other | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,695,422
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,047
of 2,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,892
of 16,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them