↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of odor identification among amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment, subjective cognitive decline, and early Alzheimer’s dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Sciences, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of odor identification among amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment, subjective cognitive decline, and early Alzheimer’s dementia
Published in
Neurological Sciences, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10072-018-3261-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sung-Jin Park, Jee-Eun Lee, Kwang-Soo Lee, Joong-Seok Kim

Abstract

Olfactory impairment might be an important clinical marker and predictor of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In the present study, we aimed to compare the degree of olfactory identification impairment in each mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subtype, subjective memory impairment, and early AD dementia and assessed the relationship between olfactory identification and cognitive performance. We consecutively included 50 patients with amnestic MCI, 28 patients with non-amnestic MCI, 20 patients with mild AD, and 17 patients with subjective memory impairment (SMI). All patients underwent clinical and neuropsychological assessments. A multiple choice olfactory identification cross-cultural smell identification test was also utilized. Controlling for age and gender, olfactory impairment was significantly more severe in patients with AD and amnestic MCI compared with the results from the non-amnestic MCI and SMI groups. Higher scores on MMSE, verbal and non-verbal memory, and frontal executive function tests were significantly related to olfactory identification ability. In conclusion, olfactory identification is impaired in amnestic MCI and AD. These findings are consistent with previous studies. In amnestic MCI patients, this dysfunction is considered to be caused by underlying AD pathology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 18%
Neuroscience 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 26 35%